Redesign Cloud Dashboard

Overview

Redesigned the Cloud platform dashboard to enhance user satisfaction and accessibility by introducing personalized marketing content and user-driven notifications. This data-backed approach enabled the successful onboarding of AWS, directly aligning the platform with evolving customer needs and expanding service offerings.

Role

Product Designer

I helped lead the design team through problem discovery, user needs identification, UX strategy development, rapid iterations, and A/B testing to shape a solution that addressed both user and business goals.

Keywords

Growth Design

Vendor Integration

Data-Validated Iteration

Impact

Impact

4% increase

in revenue

AWS Integrated

to expand service offerings and flexibility

What is the Cloud Platform?

A B2B SaaS marketplace streamlining cloud service management. It enables businesses to purchase and scale solutions from Microsoft, Adobe, and AWS via a unified procurement platform.

Problem: High Traffic, Low Engagement

Using Microsoft Clarity heatmaps, we identified low engagement and underutilized dashboard space. The lack of clear content hierarchy and a dedicated notification area led to user complaints and missed communication opportunities.

Challenge:

  • The dashboard needed to display a wide range of information, making prioritization difficult.

  • Multiple cross-functional teams were involved, each with different goals and requirements.

  • Aligning internal stakeholders while keeping the end-user experience at the center was critical.

  • We had to deeply consider what users actually needed and expected from the dashboard.

Solution

Design Process

Phase 1: Understand

Who are the stakeholders?

1: ASM Users (Internal Support Team)
Internal team members who access the platform to support customers, troubleshoot issues, and manage service-related tasks.

2: Resellers
Partners who manage multiple end-user accounts. They are responsible for purchasing, provisioning, and overseeing software and services on behalf of their clients.

3: End Users
Direct customers who use the platform to purchase, manage, and track their own software and hardware products.

User research

We conducted 1:1 interviews with each user group to understand their needs, capturing insights on sticky notes to visualize and prioritize key dashboard features.

User Desires

User Desires

1. Needing a clear view of account issues

"When I log in, I just want to quickly know what's wrong and how to fix it."


– ASM user (Male, 40s)

2. Staying informed about system updates and releases

"If something changes, like pricing or termsI need to know first. It will affects my customers."


– Reseller (Male, 38)

3. Finding help and services more easily

"Sometimes I just need help, but I don’t know where to go on the site."


– End-user (Female, 45)

Phase 2: Explore

UX Strategy

Structured Value, Higher Engagement

We developed a UX strategy focused on boosting user literacy through a structured reporting journey. By building user confidence and clarity, we aimed to drive independent report management and platform adoption.

Customer User Journey

Instilling strategies into users' journey

To concretize the strategy, we've generated features that will serve each strategy and mapped them on to the users' journey.

Phase 3: Design

New User Flow & Side Menu

We unified the experience into a single, adaptive flow that remains consistent across all user roles. The streamlined journey:

  • Consolidates access points into a unified starting page

  • Offers guided steps based on report type and user goals

  • Highlights saved templates and previously run reports

  • Clarifies scheduling, editing, and delivery options

Before User Flow & Side Menu

The old experience featured fragmented, inconsistent entry points. Different user roles relied on trial and error through informal paths, leading:

  • Confusion over which path was correct

  • Repetitive actions across different pages

  • Difficulty locating specific reports

  • Lack of standardization across user types

Ideation

We conducted a comparative usability test by presenting two prototype ideas to stakeholders. We observed how they interacted with each version and asked which one they preferred, helping us identify the more intuitive design.

Preferred Idea 1 for its:

  • Cleaner layout

  • Better readability

  • More modern visual design

Concerns with Idea 2:

  • Required excessive scrolling

  • Difficult to locate specific reports (especially with hundreds of entries)

  • Hard to scan and read long report descriptions

Idea 1

Idea 2

Phase 4: Final Delivery

New report system

  • Simplified navigation with a unified top bar and clear tabs, and organized reports by category for better readability.

  • Added a dropdown for report explanations, reducing the need to switch between pages.

  • Removed clutter and duplicate paths to enhance focus and usability.

New version

Old version

Report Template

  • The Report Templates section was moved to its own dedicated tab to reduce visual clutter and help users focus more easily.

  • The “Run” and “Edit” actions are now clearly separated into their own column, making them eas ier to locate and use.

  • The updated layout supports better scalability, allowing users to view more templates at once without feeling overwhelmed.

New version

Old version

Scheduled Report

  • Applied a consistent layout to align with the overall report management experience.

  • Designed a clear empty state view to guide users when no scheduled reports are available.

  • Added a prominent “Schedule Report” button to help users easily understand how to get started.

New version

Old version

Confirmation Component

  • Created reusable components for confirmation interactions to maintain consistency.

  • Designed success message toasts to provide clear feedback after actions are completed.

  • Built standardized modals for scheduling and editing, making it easier for developers to implement across the tool.

Phase 5: Future development

Report Generate

  • Postponed development of the report generation detail page due to time and team capacity constraints.

  • Next steps include unifying the design style across the platform for consistency.

  • Plan to redesign the report generation detail experience and validate entire experience improvements through A/B testing.

New version

Old version

Impact

Impact

12% increase

in usage

1,200 increase

reports more compared to the previous year.

Team Impact

Team Impact

Personally, it was a fruitful moment for me to contribute to a collaborative effort. Sharing our research insights on the visualized prototypes, we were able to expedite our process by reducing communication loss. Although it wasn't easy to take on this role independently, it was enlightening to see this phase adopted as a formal process in following projects.